When reading on the
background and context of the corrido, I was somewhat intrigued by how morality
is portrayed. The author gives the background information in the evolution
of the corrido, as it was driven from the very action of Border Conflict. We
come to know the agency of the Ballad maker. I find interesting how the choices
made by these anonymous people shape the story of a hero, but ultimately how they
shape the cultural representation of those that lived at the Border. I think
this is where we find a “kink” in the corrido. There are several other examples
of this ‘twisting/bending’ of morality.
Firstly, themes were
imported from the Greater Mexico corrido tradition such as love tragedy
and filial disobedience, the border ballads then evolved from this to their own
“niche” of themes. Other aspects were also imported such as the dark brooding ballad
and those that are more sentimental such as Mexican danzas. The kink I
think begins when all of this is taken to shape the story of the Border. The ballad
makers are the first to incorporate outlaws as heroes in the corridos.
They are shaping conscience and morality. Previously Mexican corridos had
been used to instill morality or religious beliefs, we see that with the border
ballad the outlaws are painted as the hero.
Secondly, the author specified
that these heroes are not to be thought of as Robin Hoods. Which for me
seemed strange, because that was what I had thought in the first part of this book.
The sense of justice/morality has been bent in this context. Paredes states the
true character of a border outlaw by stating that they don’t “(…)repent on the
scaffold in moralizing verses. They are quite frankly rogues – realistic,
selfish, and usually unrepentant.” This is one of the “kinks” in the Border
Ballad.
The ballad makers
transform them into heroes by saying that their thieving and raiding is actually
their survival in the fight against the Americans (painted as the antagonists).
It is as if they were giving crimes such as smuggling and cheating a reputable
character, even one to praise and admire.
Thirdly, there is kink
in the context of these stories of the border. The author mentions towards the
end of the book that the border ballads are shaped after Spanish models and
that it resembles Castilian romance but that “the social and physical
conditions were more like those of Scotland.” The author compares Scotland’s
struggles to many of those faced by the Border people: they were on the losing
side of the conflict, they were plagued many years by a smaller number of invaders,
etc. The Scottish ballads are some of the best British ballads and they were on
the losing side of border conflict. The same occurs on the Rio Grande, those on
the losing side are the Border Mexicans, who wrote these ballads.
This comparison is
interesting, it shows the psychology of a nation, where to make up for their
losses and sufferings they sing about their robber ‘heroes’, those that stood
up against their invaders in any shape or form. In a way, after losing their
territory they take history into their own hands by writing these ballads that are
passed down from generation to generation, of how their people stood up to the
invader, when the Truth is very different. I think each nation finds ways to
cope and retain their sovereignty when everything else might suggest otherwise.
Aha! I was wondering where we would find our kink(s). This is a great start to that discussion! :) But what you say about the balladeers "giving crimes such as smuggling and cheating a reputable character" makes me wonder if we might say that they are actually "straightening out" what would otherwise seem to be deviant, individual, and idiosyncratic?
ReplyDelete