Skip to main content

With His Pistol in His Hand II: Morality


When reading on the background and context of the corrido, I was somewhat intrigued by how morality is portrayed. The author gives the background information in the evolution of the corrido, as it was driven from the very action of Border Conflict. We come to know the agency of the Ballad maker. I find interesting how the choices made by these anonymous people shape the story of a hero, but ultimately how they shape the cultural representation of those that lived at the Border. I think this is where we find a “kink” in the corrido. There are several other examples of this ‘twisting/bending’ of morality.

Firstly, themes were imported from the Greater Mexico corrido tradition such as love tragedy and filial disobedience, the border ballads then evolved from this to their own “niche” of themes. Other aspects were also imported such as the dark brooding ballad and those that are more sentimental such as Mexican danzas. The kink I think begins when all of this is taken to shape the story of the Border. The ballad makers are the first to incorporate outlaws as heroes in the corridos. They are shaping conscience and morality. Previously Mexican corridos had been used to instill morality or religious beliefs, we see that with the border ballad the outlaws are painted as the hero.

Secondly, the author specified that these heroes are not to be thought of as Robin Hoods. Which for me seemed strange, because that was what I had thought in the first part of this book. The sense of justice/morality has been bent in this context. Paredes states the true character of a border outlaw by stating that they don’t “(…)repent on the scaffold in moralizing verses. They are quite frankly rogues – realistic, selfish, and usually unrepentant.” This is one of the “kinks” in the Border Ballad.
The ballad makers transform them into heroes by saying that their thieving and raiding is actually their survival in the fight against the Americans (painted as the antagonists). It is as if they were giving crimes such as smuggling and cheating a reputable character, even one to praise and admire.

Thirdly, there is kink in the context of these stories of the border. The author mentions towards the end of the book that the border ballads are shaped after Spanish models and that it resembles Castilian romance but that “the social and physical conditions were more like those of Scotland.” The author compares Scotland’s struggles to many of those faced by the Border people: they were on the losing side of the conflict, they were plagued many years by a smaller number of invaders, etc. The Scottish ballads are some of the best British ballads and they were on the losing side of border conflict. The same occurs on the Rio Grande, those on the losing side are the Border Mexicans, who wrote these ballads.

This comparison is interesting, it shows the psychology of a nation, where to make up for their losses and sufferings they sing about their robber ‘heroes’, those that stood up against their invaders in any shape or form. In a way, after losing their territory they take history into their own hands by writing these ballads that are passed down from generation to generation, of how their people stood up to the invader, when the Truth is very different. I think each nation finds ways to cope and retain their sovereignty when everything else might suggest otherwise.

Comments

  1. Aha! I was wondering where we would find our kink(s). This is a great start to that discussion! :) But what you say about the balladeers "giving crimes such as smuggling and cheating a reputable character" makes me wonder if we might say that they are actually "straightening out" what would otherwise seem to be deviant, individual, and idiosyncratic?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mrs. Darrell

One of the events that transpired in this second half of the book that impressed me was Mrs. Darrell’s speech on her views of the land laws. The whole event was revealing of her true nature, a nature that we have known as readers since the beginning of the novel. She was honest, showing integrity and firmness of spirit, and assumed responsibility in deceiving her husband and those involved. As it pertains to the author’s views on women, this character has voice and imposes her voice over that of men. However, the author makes it known that she has no seat among the men in the “colony” , for none offer her one, she simply steps in and speaks. That is a rupture in the behaviours set by women in the novel. Mrs. Darrell expresses a forward opinion of the Law, on matters of the land, on business, conscience and ethics. In contrast Dona Josefa, Mercedes, Elvira, Mrs. Mechlin (George’s Aunt) all seem to fit this “mold” of womanhood where matrons impose tradition and custom

The Squatter and the Don: Citizenry and Citizenship

I really enjoyed reading this first half of the novel. Several themes and concepts resonated with me and I am still processing them as I read the novel. In this post I want to talk about the characters of Clarence and Don Mariano, and how they embody a notion of “loyal citizenship”. I believe that Ruiz de Burton is a “Ciudadano Loyal” in the critique she makes against the law, underlined in the lives and experiences of the characters. Those that embody this idea of ideal citizenship are Don Mariano and Clarence. As the story unfolds these characters grow close to each other over agreeing on concepts of justice and good morals. Despite what the law was attempting to enforce, they persevere with their conscience that guides them to make good decisions out of care for their neighbour, county, and country. It is interesting for they are both members that belong to “opposing groups” to a fragmented community, one from the so called “Spaniards” and another from the “squatter”

Bless Me, Ultima: part I

As I started reading this novel, I was struck by the different mixture of belief systems. Not only in different moral systems but also in terms of choice of lifestyle. In a way, how Antonio follows his “destiny”, which we learn right from the beginning, that Ultima is the only one that truly knows where his future holds “ Only I will know his destiny”. Since his birth Antonio has been torn by the different expectations of his surrounding parental/mentor figures – his destiny traced for him: becoming a priest, becoming a vaquero destined to wander the llano, etc. This for me seems to be an overarching theme of the books we have read so far. To some capacity, we are torn between the concept of a self-made destiny and a predetermined destiny. Down these mean streets presents that conflict which we discussed in class. I am interested in how this can be applied to the general idea of Chicano culture in America. Antonio seems to be torn between different beliefs, moral systems, expectat